Though accepted that "team science is needed to tackle and conquer the health problems that are plaguing our society" (Disis & Slattery, 2010, p. 1) significant empirical evidence of team mechanisms and functional dynamics is still lacking in abundance. Through a social constructivist worldview (Creswell, 2007) this case study uses a grounded multilevel mixed methods (Borner, et al., 2010) approach to determine social mechanisms of cross-disciplinary teams (CDTs) observing a National Institutes of Health-funded research network. Observations, interviews, focus groups and through the use of the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) (Cameron and Quinn, 2006) data were collected and analyzed using qualitative coding to inform a micro/meso level of analysis between February 2010 and December 2011.
Aim 1 sets out to determine social structuring mechanisms in CDTs. It searched for the dynamics that are at the core of team collaboration by focusing on descriptive elements found in team interactions on the individual, group, and network levels (Hedström & Swedberg, 1998). Aim 2 determines how social mechanisms emerge in a transdisciplinary team. As transdisciplinarity (TD) is an unlikely constant state in social systems, it may at times be a novel outcome of team science collaborations. At other times it may be dormant to lesser multi- and interdisciplinary functions embedded within group interactions (Klein, 2008). Through theoretical and emergent coding and graphical mapping of present and preferred change perceptions of those charged with crossing disciplinary and social boundaries the answer to how these mechanism emerge has been achieved.
Findings show strong evidence of role and discipline perceptual differences that when analyzed separately provide differing insights into team functioning. When role and discipline were considered simultaneously, certain value-latent characteristics emerged as part of individual's self-perception of one's contribution to team functioning. Four main social mechanisms were identified: change, kinship, tension, and heritage. These contain identifiable team dynamics that serve as core evidence for specific team dynamics that support CDTs. This micro/meso analysis suggests that individual participation in team interactions can inform the structuration of individual role and disciplinary perceptions of macro level problems.
|Commitee:||Fiore, Stephen, Gorman, Margaret, Hinds, Pamela, Lantz, Paula|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Human and Organizational Learning|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 73/07(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Social research, Health sciences|
|Keywords:||Recriprocating, Social interactions, Social mechanisms, Structuration, Team science, Transdisciplinarity|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be