This thesis examines some of the personalities and institutions that were involved in the evolution of the four-field approach in anthropology through various historical periods into what it is today. With changing views and budget cuts, it is possible that the four-field approach in the United States will break apart. If this were to happen it could change the face of anthropology as we know it. Anthropology and the four-field approach has been evolving for over one-hundred years, and although it has at times come under attack by scholars in other fields, the four-field approach is the reason for our understanding of past civilizations, as well as understanding the similarities and differences of living societies. To allow the four-field approach to be split into several separate departments would be detrimental to the continuing study of human beings, past and present.
|Commitee:||Amster, Randall, Cash, Conor|
|School Location:||United States -- Arizona|
|Source:||MAI 50/05M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Ancient, Anthropology, Archaeology, Four-field approach, Maya, Mesoamerica|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be