This study, conducted in one Southern California district, had two complementary purposes. One was to obtain from special education teachers and regular education teachers who work in collaboration with their special education colleagues their perceptions of how the NCLB policies and practices may have affected the learning and academic performance of special education students across this period. The second was to examine actual student performance, using California test data to examine absolute year-by-year changes in mathematics and English language arts test scores of special education students during the past decade corresponding to the beginning period of NCLB/IDEA launch. Teachers (N = 72) completed a 35-item survey about their perceptions on the effect of NCLB on special education and five scales were developed from a factor analysis of their responses. In a within-subject comparison, the teachers rated "increased attention to quality of instruction" lowest of scales and "increased mainstreaming and attention to test scores" as the highest. In comparison of special education teachers with those who were not, the special education teachers perceived significantly less emphasis on mainstreaming and test scores. California standardized test scores for the year 2003 to 2010 were also analyzed for trends in achievement of special education versus general education students. The results for English language arts show that the mean difference in scores of special education and regular education students to be relatively constant across the eight-year period. While the mathematics result of special education students show a slight improvement, while that of regular education students declined; thereby accounting for what appeared to be a narrowing of achievement gap between special education and general education students in mathematics.
|Advisor:||Goodyear, Rodney K.|
|Commitee:||Goodyear, Rodney K., Hunt, Christopher H., Ojose, Bobby|
|School:||University of Redlands|
|Department:||School of Education|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-A 73/07(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Education Policy, Special education|
|Keywords:||Assessments, IDEA/NCLB, No Child Left Behind, Special education, Standardized testing, Testing|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be