The tally of injuries and property losses to extreme weather and flooding seems to be only growing in recent years. Global circulation changes and regional climate changes coupled with land use and land cover changes are creating more potentially hazardous spaces and places. The U.S. federal government sets guidelines for preparing for disasters and provides the bulk of disaster relief and recovery funding. In this country, however, the authority for instituting specific adaptation and hazard mitigation strategies lies with local governments. Local governments are responsible for guiding land-use decisions, for zoning and building codes, and for enforcing other strategies mandated by the federal government, such as the purchasing of flood insurance for homes with federal government-backed mortgages. Much of the research involves how and to what extent hazards policies can be best introduced and applied at local levels given competing economic, infrastructural, and social priorities. What has not been clearly established in the hazards research literature is a connection between established hazard mitigation objectives and urban policy-making in the years following a major disaster. The city of Tulsa, Oklahoma is a test case for deepening our understanding of the relationship between the two. This study uses an expanded version of the urban regime framework to ground data collection and analysis in the framework's three main focus areas: agenda, capacity, and relationships. The framework is expanded to include the environmental and natural resource dimensions of agenda setting, and pays special attention to spatial and locational dimensions of flood control. Planning documents, financial records and print media data sources are coded and analyzed for themes and patterns. Findings suggest that successful implementation of hazard mitigation goals and principles in Tulsa led to new questions about 'balanced growth' development, land-use planning, and resource use that have implications for hazard mitigation sustainability. This study finds that some insights offered by the urban regime theory are helpful to this particular question and possibly other questions in the hazards/disaster research agenda.
|Advisor:||Geores, Martha E.|
|Commitee:||Howland, Marie, Luna, Ronald, Silva, Julie, Zhou, Naijun|
|School:||University of Maryland, College Park|
|School Location:||United States -- Maryland|
|Source:||DAI-A 73/06, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Flooding, Hazard mitigation sustainability, Natural hazards, Urban regime|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be