The present study examines the impact of type of overt integrity item on both propensity to fake and item score. Specifically, the study asserts that item transparency is associated with item faking. Further, the present study examines type of response strategy employed when faking.
Results indicated that test takers did not fake responses very frequently despite motivation to perform well; responses were faked 13.5% of the time across all items. However, partial support was found for the expectation that item faking and performance was associated with item transparency. For example, items assessing Admission of theft and other wrongdoing were found to be faked significantly more than all but one other item type. The response strategy used most often when faking was the Perceived optimal response. The results indicate that overt integrity tests are indeed susceptible to faking, though faking does not occur as frequently as might be expected.
|Advisor:||Whitney, David J.|
|School:||California State University, Long Beach|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||MAI 50/04M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Occupational psychology, Organizational behavior|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be