This study investigated dental students’ prejudicial beliefs towards underserved patient populations as an upstream constituent of provider attitudinal barriers to care. The objectives were to explore the scope and nature of prejudicial beliefs, to assess the value of critical reflection as essential preparation for patient care, and to identify insights that would inform the preclinical curriculum that, ultimately, reduce oral health disparity.
The research used an integrated approach with qualitative and quantitative methods. An original serialized reflection assignment was introduced into the preclinical curriculum of 142 first year dental students to critically journal about the legitimacy of their a priori prejudicial beliefs. A purposive sample of 44 participants was obtained. Journals were analyzed for emergent themes and questionnaires for relevant context.
Results indicated dental students identified a range of prejudicial beliefs and, through self-direction, experienced awareness and transformation of their beliefs. Participants agreed that reflection had personal and educational value. Insights were identified that could enhance the preclinical curriculum. This contributes to the evidence base on pedagogical strategies historically focused on post-experiential reflection. Themes that were explored include concepts defining the nature of prejudicial beliefs that could guide and inform professional practice. A need was identified to conduct grounded theory research on awareness of prejudicial beliefs as an antecedent to attitude change.
|Advisor:||Roe, Kathleen M., Mamary, Edward|
|Commitee:||LaGoy, Amy, Seal, Craig|
|School:||San Jose State University|
|Department:||Public Health (Regular)|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||MAI 50/04M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Dentistry, Public health, Health education|
|Keywords:||Attitudes, Barriers to care, Dental curriculum, Prejudicial beliefs, Reflection, Self-awareness|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be