Graduate students preparing to assume leadership roles in the field of education were surveyed to investigate their beliefs and knowledge about grade retention. Approximately 160 university graduate students who were enrolled in Educational Leadership programs, the majority of whom were also experienced teachers, completed a survey and knowledge test on grade retention and social promotion. An abundance of research findings from the past century shows that academically and psychosocially, retained students do not catch up to similar peers who are promoted. Results from the present study showed that contradictory to these research findings, the majority of prospective educational leaders believed that grade retention is a useful and harmless intervention for supporting struggling students in early primary grades, and for motivating students to work harder. However, their beliefs were more in line with retention research findings in some areas. For example, most prospective educational leaders’ believed that retaining older students and retaining students multiple times are harmful practices, and that grade retention is not a useful intervention for creating more homogenous classrooms, in regards to academic skill variance. Participants identified maturity level of the student, local/state accountability standards for academic achievement, and the number of times a student was previously retained as the three most important factors they consider when making retention/promotion decisions. Consistent with a previous study using experienced teachers, present findings showed that prospective educational leaders’ knowledge about grade retention research is very limited, and that most of them rely upon knowledge gained from personal experiences (practical knowledge), as opposed to knowledge gained from research-based findings (propositional knowledge), for information about retention/social promotion. No associations were found between prospective educational leaders’ amount of propositional knowledge about retention research in regards to (1) their rate of actually recommending students for retention, and (2) their exposure to retention research through college coursework. Findings did, however, show that participants who possessed more propositional knowledge about retention research were (1) significantly more likely to cite propositional knowledge sources as their primary source of information on retention/social promotion, and (2) significantly less likely to believe that grade retention was an effective intervention for struggling students.
|Advisor:||Gaddis, Lena, McLellan, Mary|
|Commitee:||Bohan, Kathy, Gaddis, Lena, Guerrero, Shannon, McLellan, Mary, Powell, Pamela|
|School:||Northern Arizona University|
|School Location:||United States -- Arizona|
|Source:||DAI-A 73/04, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational leadership, Educational psychology|
|Keywords:||Beliefs, Grade repetition, Grade retention, Leaders, Prospective administrators, School administrators, Teachers|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be