This study articulates and maps the changes found in the historical discourses of P-16 national policy advocacy and state-level policy formation. The relationship between the momentum to create education reform through policy and the actual creation of the policy through state level regulatory entities is also explored in this research study. The theoretical model developed for this study frames three rationales for policy development—sociological, economic, and organizational rationales. Policy discourse analysis, an examination of policy language, is used as the methodology to develop the narrative of changing discourses. Understanding discourse is a way to understand the meanings, practices, and agendas of policy processes. Through policy discourse analysis, a deeper understanding of P-16 as a large scale education reform is attained. The historical mapping of P-16 discourse development in the United States provides a vital component in understanding the role of discourse in the creation of education policy. Analysis of the both national P-16 policy advocacy documents and state level P-16 policy formation documents demonstrates a shifting of discourses over time. Early P-16 advocates and policy makers were likely to use both sociological and economic rationales in sampled documents. However, later P-16 advocates and policy makers were more likely to use economic rationales. A stable foundation of organizational discourse was uncovered historically throughout both advocacy documents and policy formation documents and provides P-16 with a potential mode of sustainability. In addition, this research found evidence that P-16 policy advocacy discourses were influential on P-16 policy formation discourses.
|Advisor:||Theroux, Pamela J.|
|Commitee:||Lawson, Hal A., Schiller, Kathryn S.|
|School:||State University of New York at Albany|
|Department:||Educational Administration and Policy Studies|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 73/04, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Education legislation, Education policy analysis, Education reform, P-16 initiatives, Policy discourse analysis, Reform|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be