The Supreme Court ruling in Samantar v. Yousuf resolved the split in the circuit courts with regard to whether defendants in civil lawsuits who were individual foreign officials could receive immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA). The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that they could not. Under the common law, the Executive Branch may now continue to issue binding "suggestions of immunity" to the courts when determining whether to grant or deny immunity to an individual foreign official. This paper discusses the Court's reasoning behind its decision in Samantar and the reasons why the Executive Branch, and not the judiciary, should exercise primary control over immunity determinations for individual foreign officials in the future.
|Advisor:||Murphy, Sean D.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||MAI 50/03M, Masters Abstracts International|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be