This study sought to examine the journalistic tone of snark. How does a snarky news tone affect audience reception among readers of both hard news and soft news stories? Specifically, the study sought to find how snark engaged and entertained readers and how humorous and credible readers found snark. An initial pretest of 41 participants read 20 news excerpts from the gossip news blog Gawker and the New York Times and rated them on a snark index of five qualities: wit, aggression, irony, informality, and critique.
The pretest successfully established that a difference in tone existed between the two news sources, based on the snark index, and allowed a subsequent experiment, involving 8 of the 20 news excerpts, to test for effects. In the experiment (N=99), people found snarky stories more engaging (p<.05), entertaining (p<.01), and humorous (p<.01) than non-snarky stories. However, people also found snark less credible (p<.01) and reported wanting to read snark less than regular news (p<.01). People reported finding soft news more entertaining (p<.01) and humorous (p<.01) than hard news, and this difference of story type significantly interacted with snark in all measures except entertainment.
The results suggest that snark has incredible power to attract attention. Considering the continuing expansion of Internet news media and increase in soft news coverage, further research needs to address journalistic tone and specifically biting, personality-driven snark.
|School:||University of Missouri - Columbia|
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||MAI 50/03M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Journalism, Web Studies, Mass communications|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.