The cultural dimension of individualism-collectivism (I-C), and how best to measure it, continues to be controversial in cross-cultural psychology. An important aspect of I-C at the individual level is self-construals. Markus and Kitayama (1991) distinguished independent and interdependent self-construals and Singelis (1994) adopted this two-dimensional representation of self-construals in developing the Self-Construal Scale (SCS). Although the SCS has been translated into many languages and widely administered across cultures, few researchers have systematically tested its psychometric properties or the generalizability of its structure across diverse cultures. The purpose of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties, dimensionality, and cross-cultural structural equivalence of SCS.
Archival data from six studies that used the 30-item version of the SCS was analyzed. Participants included college students from two individualistic countries, the United States and Australia, and four collectivistic countries, Mexico, Philippines, Malaysia, and Japan. Hypotheses were: 1) A hierarchical model, with multiple independent and interdependent facets, will provide the best structural representation of self-construals as measured by the SCS and will replicate fairly well across cultures, and 2) Gender differences in selected aspects of self-construals will be identified. In particular, in all cultures, it was expected that females would endorse relational interdependence items or scales more than males, and that males would endorse assertiveness items or scales more than females. Structural analyses were conducted using Comprehensive Exploratory Factor Analysis (Hardin et al., 2004) and confirmatory factor analysis.
Hypothesis 1 was partially supported. The structure of self-construals, as measured by the SCS, was better represented by multiple specific factors than by broad independent and interdependent dimensions (i.e., a two-dimensional model). Also, the pattern of correlations among the specific factors was not consistent with distinct higher-order independent and interdependent dimensions. The psychometric properties (i.e., reliability, item-total correlations) of the SCS were marginal in most countries and the structure of the SCS did not replicate well across most cultures. Hypothesis 2 was rejected because gender differences for relational interdependence and assertiveness were not found. The results of the study have implications for both theory (e.g., the structure of self-construals) and measurement in cross-cultural research.
|Advisor:||Church, A. Timothy|
|Commitee:||McCubbin, Laurie, Trevisan, Michael|
|School:||Washington State University|
|School Location:||United States -- Washington|
|Source:||DAI-B 73/02, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Social psychology, Counseling Psychology|
|Keywords:||Cross-culture, Independence, Interdependence, Self-construals|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be