This dissertation provides a continuous, parametric study of the development of task-switch efficiency between the ages of 3-7 years. It examines the degree to which several leading explanations for switching efficiency from both the developmental and adult literature predict individual and age-related gains in accuracy and reaction time (RT) in switching tasks in early childhood. These include executive functioning (executive functions–based) accounts along with newer models of cue-processing effects. Previous work has recognized the importance of cue-processing in adult task-switch, but this dissertation provides one of the first systematic investigations of cue-processing effects in childhood. We manipulate the semantic content of verbal cues both in task-switch paradigms and in simple, no-conflict, non-switch cued matching tests. We find that differences integrating such cues can account for both individual differences and age-related changes in flexibility. These include the catastrophic switching errors made by young children in traditional task-switch tests (and also made by older children in more complicated, indirectly or arbitrarily-cued paradigms) as well as children’s switch costs. Traditional explanations for performance on card-based rule sorting tasks (such as the Dimension Change Card Sort Task, DCCS (Zelazo, 1996, 2006) do not adequately account for both performance patterns. Further, we extend the idea of cue-processing and cognitive flexibility as predictors of one kind of real-world indirect cue: discourse referents.
|Advisor:||Deak, Gedeon O.|
|Commitee:||Coulson, Seana, Kehler, Andrew, Kutas, Marta, Pashler, Hal|
|School:||University of California, San Diego|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-B 73/02, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Developmental psychology, Cognitive psychology|
|Keywords:||Cognitive flexibility, Cue processing, Executive functioning, Inhibition, Processing speed, Task switching|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be