This paper will cover the same-sex marriage movement, considering the position of the gay community in American society and how their culture and mobilization is challenging the hegemonic heterosexual marriage group. To some members of society, the same-sex marriage movement is today's civil rights issue because of the many rights and privileges granted through marriage. Little specific research has been conducted on the same-sex marriage movement. Researching this issue may enable us to see the patterns and trends, thereby predicting directions the movement should focus on. It may also reveal further knowledge of power structures between the heterosexual community and the gay community. By tracing the passage of 56 various state and federal initiatives concerning same-sex marriage and landmark court rulings, along with public opinion about same-sex marriage tracked over time by the Gallup Poll, I will argue the amount of initiatives and court rulings are related to an overall positive growth in public opinion toward gay marriage. Antonio Gramsci's concept of hegemony will be used to explain gays' and lesbians' position in society and why they do not have these rights currently. The paper will involve a discussion of how hegemony affects the law and therefore the law upholds heterosexual marriage. It will also involve a discussion of how the hegemonic group has used policy to support heterosexual marriage while court cases have attempted to bring a new hegemony. I will use historical evidence, state initiatives, court rulings and previous research and literature to show the struggles and victories of the same-sex marriage movement. This will be a quantitative paper based on review and analysis, as well as sociological theory.
|Advisor:||Chambliss, William J.|
|Commitee:||Tuch, Steven A.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||MAI 50/02M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||LGBTQ studies, Sociology|
|Keywords:||Attitude, Culture, Hegemony, Law, Marriage, Same-sex|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be