The earliest inhabitants of the Great Basin adapted to a well-watered environment that was already set to disappear. This much seems clear from paleoenvironmental data, but a good understanding of how the declining ecosystem affected Paleoindian peoples still eludes us. In the now-barren expanse of the Great Salt Lake Desert, the Old River Bed (ORB) delta existed as a sprawling distributary wetland at the Pleistocene-Holocene transition. At its peak, the system would have been one of the largest marshlands in the Great Basin. Paleoindians visited the distal reaches of the wetlands between about 12,100 and 9900 cal BP, when it finally dried up. My study tracks spatial and temporal variability in lithic technology across the distal ORB to address issues of how people coped with the regionally deteriorating environment. Patterns are compared between the west and east sides of the study area, which roughly date to sequential time frames of 12,100–11,200 cal BP and 11,300–9900 cal BP, respectively, based on dating of buried wetland organics. These subareas correspond with spatially distinct groups of distributary paleochannels.
Using a formal technological model, lithic data are examined in terms of reduction strategies, toolstone selection, and morphology as they relate to emphasis on transport efficiency. The results of the analysis show that people were more transport-efficiency conscious earlier in time than they were later. According to the model, this directly relates to occupation length—viewed here as time spent in the basin, not necessarily at a single site—whereby increasing mobility necessitates the need for transport efficiency in order to reduce the risks of not having enough stone on-hand and the costs of having to procure more. When the study subareas are compared, west-subarea assemblages indicate greater emphasis on transport efficiency with streamlined toolkits made more often from obsidian than seen in the east subarea, where fine-grained volcanic (FGV) stone is more common. This strategy placed a buffer of toolstone into relatively large tools that were reduced bifacially through an extended sequence. Parman, Lake Mojave, and Cougar Mountain projectile points tend to be associated with the west subarea and this technological pattern.
The technology of the east subarea is "flakier," with smaller tools being made from transported flake blanks following a more local toolstone profile. This strategy shifts costs from the production and maintenance investments of transport efficiency to the transport of stone directly to its location of use. Bonneville and Pinto projectile points tend to be associated with the east subarea and this technological pattern. A second pattern found predominately in east-subarea sites is the extreme economization of obsidian. Various small biface fragments and irregular tools are seen, and the extensively reworked Stubby stemmed type is also more common in this subarea. This reduction pattern signals higher predictability in tool-use requirements and raw material acquisition.
These data are interpreted to represent shorter basin occupations earlier and longer basin occupations later in time. Assuming the total ORB delta was more or less always capable of sustaining people for long periods of time while it existed, any shift in settlement mobility should be driven by conditions in the other regional wetlands they visited. Being in such a large drainage basin, the ORB likely persisted while smaller basin wetlands succumbed to Early Holocene drying more rapidly. Thus, I argue that the shift in lithic technology seen on the distal ORB provides a dynamic model for how people responded to regional environmental decline that is currently missing from Paleoindian studies.
|Commitee:||Elston, Robert G., Goebel, Ted, Panorska, Anna K., Rhode, David|
|School:||University of Nevada, Reno|
|School Location:||United States -- Nevada|
|Source:||DAI-A 72/12, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Archaeology, Paleoecology, Native American studies|
|Keywords:||Ecology, Great Basin, Hunter-gatherers, Lithic technology, Obsidian hydration dating, Old River Bed, Paleoindian, Utah|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be