The designers of our built environment have created public facilities that are segregated by gender for their use. Common examples of such spaces are public restrooms, locker rooms, prisons, and shelters. While these gendered structures may exist to promote safety and modesty in our culture, these spaces present a problem for those who do not conform to traditional gender presentation. People who are trans or gender non-conforming may face denial of access, harassment, and violence in the gendered spaces in American society. These experiences can lead to problems in employment, education, health, and participation in public life. Some U.S. jurisdictions have enacted protective legislation and adopted regulations that seek to alleviate these problems. Washington, DC is one jurisdiction that has enacted specific protections for people who are trans and gender non-conforming in gender-segregated public facilities.
Research for this study relies on a community-based participant action approach using mixed methods to provide problem definition and a study of the policy process. First, survey research and interviews are utilized to define the problems faced by trans and gender non-conforming people in gender-segregated spaced in Washington, DC. Second, an exploratory single case study of the policy process in Washington, DC provides a description of the main factors that led to the adoption of these protections, including discussion of how activists, advocacy groups, community members, organizations, and government officials worked to create and enact these protections. Finally, this study provides short-term and long-term public policy goals to ameliorate the problems trans and gender non-conforming people continue to face in gender-segregated public facilities and creates hypotheses for further study.
|Advisor:||Harrison, Cynthia E.|
|Commitee:||Deitch, Cynthia, Infeld, Donna, Lambert, Sharon, Ramlow, Todd|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Public Policy and Public Administration|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 71/04, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||GLBT Studies, Public administration, Public policy, Gender studies|
|Keywords:||Activism, Built environment, Discrimination, Gender, Gender regulation, Public administration, Public facilities, Public policy, Transgender, Washington, D.C.|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be