The purpose of this study was to examine the processes of evaluation, selection, adoption and diffusion of a Course Management System (CMS). This study incorporated two institutions, each having six participants. The participants were placed into three categories: faculty, staff, and administration. Each participant was either a faculty member, who was also an early adopter of the institution's CMS, a staff member, or an administrator. Each participant was involved in part or all of the evaluation, selection, adoption and diffusion processes.
The outcome of the study indicated that the participation of these individuals helped the institutions evaluate and select their CMS. In addition, the study indicated that each institution arrived at their decisions through different evaluation and selection processes. University #1 consisted of a committee to evaluate and select their system, while University #2 comprised members of the Technology Department and utilized the input of faculty members to help select a system. The findings also recommended that the participation of these individuals influenced others to adopt the system. Each university, however, provided different incentives to entice the adoption of these systems.
The study recommends that institutions with the resources might be more suitable to adopt open-source systems than smaller institutions without adequate resources to maintain these systems. Furthermore, the research suggests that additional studies are needed to analyze how many small institutions are using open-source systems and to what extent are they using these systems.
|Commitee:||Lockard, James, Robinson, Rhonda S.|
|School:||Northern Illinois University|
|Department:||Educational Technology, Research and Assessment|
|School Location:||United States -- Illinois|
|Source:||DAI-A 69/05, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Course management systems, Innovation diffusion, Technology adoption|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be