Crisis communication studies in non-Western culture are relatively rare and few examples of cross-cultural issues have been examined in the literature. Filling the gap left in current literature, the purpose of this study was to conduct a cross-cultural comparison of U.S., Taiwan and Australia to examine whether these different cultural contexts are related to different crisis communication approaches. Specifically, the three case studies - Martha Stewart, BenQ and HIH - were designed to explore the intersection of crisis communication, intercultural communication and crisis leadership.
From the data analysis, three general themes emerged across all three of these cases: (1) abuse of asymmetrical information, (2) ignoring the warning signs, and (3) failure in crisis response. It was evident in these three cases that no singular strategy was implemented, but instead several actions and communication initiatives were taken. However, the results of the study indicated that denial and shifting the blame to others were the prototypical strategies in all three cases, especially as the corporate leaders tried to distance themselves from the wrongdoings. They were more concerned about avoiding legal liabilities rather than public opinion. In these three cases, stakeholders also found little comfort or reassurances in their codes of ethics.
Furthermore, crisis response is unique within each culture and there are both similarities and differences across cultures. The differences can be explained theoretically using dimensions of cultural variability. The results suggested that individualism-collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, and low-high context communication showed significant differences in these three cases when handling their corporate crises. This study confirmed the view that cultural sensitivity is a key to successfully manage crisis communication. Therefore, corporate communication practitioners must recognize that there is “no one size fits all” approach to manage crisis communication. In short, culture does matter and plays a significant role in response to a crisis situation. While the major guideline of crisis response strategies is widely considered to be universal across cultures, the way in which it operates is still viewed as culturally specific. The implications of this study point to a further need for developing a Situated Cultural Crisis Communication model.
|Commitee:||Griffin, Donyale, Novak, Julie, Yaprak, Attila|
|School:||Wayne State University|
|School Location:||United States -- Michigan|
|Source:||DAI-A 70/01, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Management, Communication, Mass communications|
|Keywords:||Corporate communication, Crisis, Crisis communication, Crisis leadership, Cross-cultural study, Intercultural communication, Leadership, Public relations|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be