This study is an analysis of the Supreme Court's Olmstead v. L.C. decision of 1999. The Olmstead decision supports the "integration mandate" in the Americans with Disabilities Act, by asserting that states have an obligation to provide services in the community, as opposed to in an institution, to people with disabilities who can benefit from such services, and that failure to do so provides a basis for discrimination. The focus of this study was on the implementation of the Olmstead decision in California, as it affects older adults. David Gil's social policy framework was used to analyze this policy. Primary and secondary sources such as peer reviewed journals, government reports, and state records were used to collect data. This study found that while California spends a large percentage of its budget on long-term care services compared to other states, barriers to service continue to exist.
|Advisor:||Ranney, Molly J.|
|School:||California State University, Long Beach|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||MAI 50/01M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Gerontology, Social work, Aging|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.