Prior research suggests that married adults are at lower risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality although being married, per se is not universally beneficial, but rather, the quality of the relationship is important. Such work has documented relationships that differ in their underlying positive and negative substrates. For instance, some close relationships are characterized by high levels of both positivity and negativity (ambivalence) which may be a significant source of stress. Couples with ambivalent relationships may not experience the same cardiovascular-protective benefits of marriage. Thus the aims of the current study were to elucidate the physiological pathways by which spousal relationship quality may ultimately influence long-term health and to examine the roles of relationship quality on daily ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), an independent predictor of cardiovascular health. Additionally, as relationships progress through multiple interactions, the behavioral styles of the spouses may be altered in ways that establish greater complimentarity. Thus an additional aim of this study was to examine relationship quality both in terms of how one perceives their spouse’s underlying positive or negative behavior, and how they perceive they behave toward their spouse. We hypothesized that relationships perceived as more ambivalent would result in higher individual daily ABP and worse interpersonal processes. We also tested a meditational model based on principles of complimentarity and interpersonal processes and expected that when an individual views their spouse’s behavior as ambivalent, this would significantly influence the individual’s levels of ambivalence in their own behavior.
We examined ABP during the day and evening among 94 married couples aged 18 to 63 (M=29.4). For our primary analyses we used Proc Mixed and analysis revealed a significant effect of relationship quality on systolic blood pressure for spousal ambivalence (SBP) (p=.01), and a significant effect of relationship quality for own behavior on SBP ( p=.0002) and on diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (p=.009) such that those individuals who viewed their relationship as more ambivalent (both positive and negative) had higher SBP and DBP during daily life. Relationship quality was also associated with worse interpersonal processes such as lower reported partner responsiveness (p=.0005), intimacy ( p<.0001) and greater negative affect (p=.026) for spousal ambivalence and lower reported intimacy (p=.003) and greater negative affect (p=.0016) for own ambivalence. These findings suggest that individuals may not benefit from the positivity that exists in ambivalent marriages and this may negatively influence long-term health.
|Advisor:||Uchino, Bert N.|
|Commitee:||Butner, Jonathan, Diamond, Lisa, Light, Kathleen C., Smith, Timothy W.|
|School:||The University of Utah|
|School Location:||United States -- Utah|
|Source:||DAI-B 72/10, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Ambivalence, Blood pressure, Cardiovascular function, Marriage, Relationship quality, Social support|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be