The purpose of this dissertation is to examine how one AP English teacher plans and prepares curriculum in her open-enrollment, heterogeneous AP English Literature class as well as how she manages dilemmas as she plans. College Board implemented the open-enrollment policy in the late 1990s, yet little research exists which considers how teachers are planning curriculum to support this more diverse body of AP students. As the student population in the United States becomes increasingly de-tracked and heterogeneous, teachers who have experience teaching AP classes before and after the open-enrollment policy offer a unique perspective on meeting high academic standards among students with varying degrees of readiness to meet such standards as well as managing the dilemmas inherent in the transition to open-enrollment.
This dissertation presents an in-depth, prototypic case study of one AP English teacher in an open-enrollment classroom. This teacher was asked to explain her planning process using an exemplar unit, reflect on student performance on the unit evaluation and explain how this information impacted the subsequent unit, and plan an on-demand lesson plan using a released AP English exam. Findings from the study show this AP teacher reported an increase in planning challenges without any corresponding increase in planning affordances. The increases in planning challenges were categorized as a variety of dilemmas including AP Exam Results versus Authentic Curricular Experience, Stiff Standards versus Flexible Standards, Teacher Centered versus Student Centered Curriculum, and Academic Language versus Expression of Ideas that were embedded in key decisions during planning. The implications include critical suggestions for future research and for policy including the purpose of the open-enrollment policy, breadth of the AP curriculum, lack of support and collaboration opportunities, responsibility for AP exam results, increased dilemma-load and decreased resources for teachers, and essential systemic changes to support "good" teaching.
|Advisor:||Donahue, David M.|
|Commitee:||Ayers, Richard, Richert, Anna E., Schultz, Katherine|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-A 72/10, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||AP, Advanced Placement, Curriculum, Dilemmas, English, Heterogeneous design, Lesson planning, Open enrollment|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be