A combination of complex change, and competition for talent, resources, markets, and demands for sustainable growth is generating changes in thinking regarding the purpose, structure, and societal contributions of today's organizations.
Historically, organization theories are based on a linear, static, Aristotelian linguistic structure that is not in alignment with the principles of nature—or with the human nervous system and our experience of the world—which is dynamic and often non-linear. My thesis in this dissertation is that using linguistic structures that are aligned with natural systems principles can lead to more effective change processes in organizations.
My many years of work in corporations designing and implementing systemic change led me to question why organizational change and employee development programs produced such shallow returns for the enormous resources invested. I realized that transforming the way language is used could be a crucial leverage point in developing more effective organization theories and practices. My research—which integrates notions from Korzybski's non-aristotelian systems (sic) and general semantics, and from philosophy, psychology, science, art, conscious abstracting, human nervous system functioning, and a hybrid of a Native American talking circle and Bohmian dialogue—provides scientific evidence that language structure influences human behavior, perceptions, evaluations, sensemaking, and use of language.
Four primary questions guided the present inquiry: (a) How does the outdated structure of Western languages impact an organization's experience when it attempts to put theory formulated with such linguistic structure into practice?; (b & c) Does our lack of knowledge about human nervous system functioning and what it does (abstracting from the dynamic energy world) present a corollary problem?; (d) How might a non-aristotelian orientation, as found in general semantics, help advance a new theory on the science and art of "design-to-practice" organizational theory formulation processes?
In this dissertation, I have accomplished the central goal of developing and presenting a new process for creating "design-to-practice" theories of organization sustainability and individual self-manifestation by applying a functional language based on nature's laws that aligns theory-building processes with nature's laws—a new theory-formulating model that can contribute to the humanizing of 21st century organizations.
|Commitee:||Montuori, Alfonso, Sheppard, Nomi|
|School:||California Institute of Integral Studies|
|Department:||Humanities, Individualized Pathway|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-A 72/09, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Linguistics, Epistemology, Organization Theory|
|Keywords:||Functional language, General semantics, Organizational behavior, Philosophy, Psychology, Science, Sustainability|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be