No significant difference in beginning ninth-grade pretest compared to ending ninth-grade posttest comparisons of American History t(17) = 0.34, p = .37 (one-tailed), d = 0.09, English t(17) = 1.40, p = .09 (one-tailed), d = 0.34, and Biology (t(17) = -1.58, p = .07 (one-tailed), d = -0.22, course grade scores were observed for students at-risk who accepted optional summer transition to high school program participation and completed the required school year long placement on a core content team. Students at-risk who refused optional summer transition to high school program participation but completed the required school year long placement on a core content team also had no significant pretest-posttest course grade score comparisons for American History t(7) = 1.34, p = .11 (one-tailed), d = 0.45, English t(7) = -0.75, p = .24 (one-tailed), d = -0.26, and Biology t(7) = 1.00, p = .18 (one-tailed), d = 0.08. However, null hypotheses were rejected for pretest-posttest comparisons of math course grade scores in the direction of course grade digression for optional summer transition to high school program accepters t(17) = 2.80, p = .01 (one-tailed), d = 0.50 and students who refused to participate t(7) = 2.55, p = .02 (one-tailed), d = 0.60. No significant posttest-posttest grade score comparisons were found. Overall, students of both groups completed the school year with average achievement grade scores in American History, English, and biology. Finally, given the statistical equipoise observed for school engagement frequencies and reported no office referral compared to reported office referral frequencies it may be said that both groups of at-risk students, those who refused and those who accepted optional summer transition to high school program participation and completed the required school year long placement on a core content team were equally well served by the required school year long placement on a core content team.
|Advisor:||Hill, John W.|
|Commitee:||Dlugosh, Larry L., Grandgenett, Neal F., Surface, Jeanne L.|
|School:||University of Nebraska at Omaha|
|Department:||Educational Administration and Supervision|
|School Location:||United States -- Nebraska|
|Source:||DAI-A 72/06, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||School administration, Educational psychology, Secondary education|
|Keywords:||And behavior outcomes, At-risk measured achievement, At-risk students, Core content team, Engagement, Ninth-grade students, Optional summer transition to high school program, Required school year long placement, Summer school program, Transition to high school|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be