The present study is based on an experimental design and employed a single subject, multiple baseline (ABAB) design to compare indicated and contra-indicated oral reading fluency interventions. The purpose of the study was to obtain data to determine the long-term stability and effectiveness of BEA indicated interventions. The entire study took place over an 8-month period. The researcher hypothesized that the BEA indicated intervention would remain the most effective intervention and that the two most effective BEA indicated interventions, in combination, would produce greater gains than only one BEA indicated intervention, and the contra indicated intervention, over the course of an extended analysis. Results of the study indicated that, overall, the indicated intervention did appear to remain the most effective although different conclusions could be drawn based on which indices were used to assess the most effective treatment in the long term.
|School:||California State University, Long Beach|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||MAI 49/04M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Elementary education, Educational psychology, Literacy, Reading instruction|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be