In 1967, Katz v. United States ruled that the protections of the Fourth Amendment's Search and Seizure Clause apply only when an individual's subjective expectation of privacy is objectively reasonable. In criminal cases, judges determine this without the benefit of data that could inform the judiciary about how society conceptualizes privacy which, in turn, would provide an empirical basis for deeming an expectation of privacy "objectively reasonable." The present study provides such data by " asking participants to rate on a Likert scale the degree of privacy they thought should be accorded to various areas under situations drawn from the fact-patterns of leading Fourth Amendment cases. The socio-legal and public policy implications of the results are explored.
|School:||California State University, Long Beach|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||MAI 49/04M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Law, Legal Studies, Criminology|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be