This quantitative comparative study examined gender differences among male and female high school educators’ chosen interventions in students’ bullying. The sample for this study included 132 high school educators out of a population of 412 from five public high schools in southwestern Ohio. Educators responded to an electronic survey asking them to read vignettes representing three types of bullying events and to choose the highest level of intervention they would likely take for both aggressor and victim. Participants received one of four surveys varying only in the gender-specific names of the bullies and victims. Survey responses provided data for educators’ perceptions of male bullies and male victims, female bullies and female victims, male bullies and female victims, and female bullies and male victims. Data analysis with ANOVAs found some statistically significant results including educators choosing a higher level of intervention for verbal bullying than for physical or relational bullying, and female educators choosing a higher level of intervention for male victims than did male educators. Marginally significant results indicated that male educators chose a higher level of intervention for female victims than male victims of relational bullying. Effect size calculations added depth to analyses. Results indicated that more research about student bullying needs completing with high school educators and students.
|Advisor:||Lillestol, Jane Brush|
|School:||University of Phoenix|
|School Location:||United States -- Arizona|
|Source:||DAI-A 72/05, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational leadership, Secondary education, Gender studies|
|Keywords:||Bullying, Effect size, Gender bullying, High school bullying, Ohio, Social-ecological|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be