Scope and Method of Study. The following qualitative study examined an exploratory dance student ratings tool used to assess American dance technique courses. A divergence between a conventional learning environment and the dance technique classroom appeared to be present within the literature and therefore, this study was conducted with the intention of creating a dialogue among educators and administrators to encourage exploration of this variance and its implications on universal assessment tools. 400 American dance students and 8 American dance professors participated in the study. Through surveys and standardized open-ended interviews dance professors described their perceptions of the dimensions of teaching assessed by the exploratory tool and the appropriateness of these prescribed pedagogies to dance technique courses.
Findings and Conclusions. The data collected and analyzed for this study supported dimensions of effective teaching used in the dance classroom purported by dance scholars. The study also revisited the assessment literature for traditional educational environments in an effort to compare dimensions of effective teaching used in a conventional academic setting to those articulated by this study. This study determined that a divergence between the two teaching environments was indeed apparent and consequently, the impact of universal ratings tool within non-conventional classrooms warranted discussion.
|Advisor:||Wanger, Stephen P.|
|Commitee:||Kearney, Kerri, Mendez, Jesse|
|School:||Oklahoma State University|
|Department:||Education (all programs)|
|School Location:||United States -- Oklahoma|
|Source:||MAI 49/04M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Dance, Educational evaluation, Pedagogy, Performing Arts|
|Keywords:||Dance assessment, Dance pedagogy, Dimensions of teaching, Jazz dance pedagogy, Student ratings tool, Tap dance pedagogy|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be