Historically, and particularly since the end of World War II, United States military installations overseas have served to protect the U.S. and the nation hosting the installations against prevailing international threat. However, as international threat has transitioned from nations and militaries to small groups or individuals the efficacy of a U.S. base in a foreign country to provide security is called into question. This study examines the relationship between U.S. military bases in a foreign country and terrorist attacks in that country from 1999 to 2008. During this period there was an ongoing effort to restructure U.S. foreign policy, including military doctrine and force structure, to face a changing international environment. Using a mixed methods design, the study draws from base politics literature, social science literature and terrorism literature to develop an understanding of how presence and numbers of U.S. military installations in a country are related to the terrorist attacks in that country. Quantitative analysis finds that, with few exceptions, there is no significant relationship between U.S. installations and terrorist attacks in a country when evaluated at the global or regional levels. Furthermore, the study identifies a distribution anomaly which occurs when relating counts of bases and attacks. The qualitative analysis, using an intervention analysis design, finds only minimal evidence of a relationship between U.S. bases and terrorist attacks in a country when examining countries which allowed the first U.S. base into the country or removed the last U.S. base in the country during the study period. Further, this analysis finds that U.S. bases in a country are, at best, tangentially related to terrorist attacks in a few countries. For the majority of the countries studied no relationship was evident. Thus, while terrorist attacks may be a consideration one of the many factors in the domestic and international environment in the base decision making process, despite an abundance of rhetoric to the contrary, there is no specific justification for terrorist activity to have a position of great importance in the process.
|Advisor:||Brown, Mitchell, Crystal, Jill|
|School Location:||United States -- Alabama|
|Source:||DAI-A 72/04, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Political science, Military studies|
|Keywords:||Foreign policy, Military, Military bases, Overseas basing, Terrorism, U.S. foreign policy|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be