Since the inception of the No Child Left Behind Act, school accountability has increased dramatically. The federal government has taken a much more active role in public education than it did prior to NCLB becoming law. Schools across the United States are working diligently to meet increased accountability standards. As schools and districts meet these accountability standards, many schools apply and receive awards based on various criteria. Two examples of school recognition programs are the Blue Ribbon and Gold Star awards programs. Schools who are publicly rewarded for their efforts gain popular notoriety throughout school communities. This report is a problem based learning project which focuses on if award winning schools demonstrate the characteristics identified by Jim Collins's book, Good to Great.
The team investigated whether award winning schools possess the same characteristics that Collins identifies in great organizations? The project team developed a set of criteria for great schools and districts by studying and adapting the criteria identified by Jim Collins and described in Good to Great. To answer the aforementioned question, 6 school districts in the KC metro region of the state of Missouri were identified to determine if award winning schools possess the characteristics identified by Collins. More importantly, research was conducted to determine if non-award winning schools possess the same characteristics as their recognized counterparts. The team identified two Blue Ribbon award winning districts, one Gold Star award winning districts, and three school districts whose reputations and distinction in performance award identifies them as outstanding school districts. All three of the publicly known successful school districts have not received a Gold Star or Blue Ribbon award during the past decade.
The team reviewed literature regarding successful and effective schools and districts in order to assess the degree to which the criteria used by education organizations to select award winners is grounded in "best practice" literature. A project survey was developed and school administrators and teachers were surveyed in all six schools. The attitudes and beliefs of each subject was identified in the project survey. Finally, the project team compared criteria used to select school and district award winners with the Collins' criteria. The team project reports the results of the analysis and made recommendations to various audiences regarding the identification of "great" schools in order to help educators identify their schools as successful and work toward establishing criteria that are evidence-based.
|School:||Saint Louis University|
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||DAI-A 72/04, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational evaluation, Educational leadership, Educational administration|
|Keywords:||Accountability, Award winning schools, Blue Ribbon schools, Gold Star schools, Good to Great, Non-award winning schools, Successful schools|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be