The aim of this study is to develop and translate a psychometrically valid and reliable, population-based, needs assessment instrument, the PCNA-EAV, to measure the health care and support care needs of patients with advanced cancer.
The cross-sectional study design combined qualitative and quantitative methods, to test instrument reliability and validity, and to examine the association between sample characteristics and health care and support needs. The 116-item, PCNA-EAV, comprised 10 domains of need: physical/functional; social; psychological/emotional; information; communication; helpful resources; financial; religious/spiritual; priority of need; and preference for care.
The target population was all cancer patients in the department of oncology at King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh (KAMC-R), Saudi Arabia. The survey was conducted in three stages: pretest, pilot and retest, using a purposive sampling technique to recruit pretest and pilot subjects. Retest subjects were all participants in the pilot phase, who consented to be re-interviewed.
Results for estimates of reliability and validity were mixed. Eight of the 16 PCNA-EAV scale and subscale estimates of reliability (Cronbach's alpha) were acceptable to excellent, ranging from α=0.70 to α=0.91. Test-retest reliability showed 11 of the 16 scales reliable over time (p⇒.05), ranging from r(9)=.44, p=.17, to r(9)=.12, p=.72. Face and content validity were demonstrated, through expert panel review. P-values for the test for convergent validity are not significant (p.05); however, the trend indicates a positive association between variables, overall.
This study extends existing work on cross-cultural instrument translation, adaptation, and validation. Further research is required, using multiple sites, and a larger sample size, to psychometrically validate the instrument, which has the potential to be a useful measure for use in Arabic-speaking, Islamic cultures.
Key words: needs assessment, palliative care, instrument, validation, reliability, cancer
|Advisor:||Slovensky, Donna J., Houser, Howard W.|
|Commitee:||Ferris, Frank F., Foushee, Herman R., Glandon, Gerald L.|
|School:||The University of Alabama at Birmingham|
|School Location:||United States -- Alabama|
|Source:||DAI-B 72/03, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Health care management|
|Keywords:||Cancer, Needs assessment, Palliative care, Psychometric validation, Reliability|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be