In the face of defeat, national militaries occasionally exhibit the ability to engage in doctrinal innovation in an attempt to alter the course of a war. In Vietnam, the US Army was unable to achieve the objectives for which the war was being fought and suffered strategic defeat. In Iraq, it nearly met the same fate. In each case, the Army initially fought with a doctrine ill-suited for the achievement of the goals identified by the president. In each case, there existed within the organization individuals who sought to innovate doctrine in an attempt to salvage the war. In Vietnam, proponents of existent Army doctrine effectively resisted innovation. In Iraq, such resistance was overcome.
This dissertation examines the processes though which doctrinal innovation occurs during wartime by examining attempts at innovation during the US’ wars in Vietnam and Iraq. In both cases, bureaucratic politics and organizational dynamics affected the Army’s ability to successfully innovate doctrine.
It is argued here that doctrinal innovations are the product of a learning process that updates core assumptions about how an armed service should fight. Such processes are more likely to be successful when innovators are able to leverage their bureaucratic position to: initiate a debate within the organization about the appropriateness of existent doctrinal assumptions, develop a backchannel network outside the organization that allows them to gain the political and material support of civilian authorities, and emplace a new consensus within the organization’s combatant command in favor of innovation.
|Advisor:||Lebovic, James H.|
|Commitee:||Deering, Christopher J., Griffith, Thomas E., Nagl, John A., Saunders, Elizabeth N.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 72/03, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Political science, Organizational behavior, Military studies|
|Keywords:||Army, Bureaucratic politics, Military doctrine, Organizational learning, US Army, United States|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be