The goal for the genetic counselor is to ensure that a client makes an informed decision about whether to pursue genetic testing. The current study seeks to better understand the process by which an analogue client responds to the cognitive, affective, and decisional demands when deciding whether to pursue genetic testing in the prenatal and cancer genetic counseling contexts.
This is a secondary analysis of data collected during the Genetic Counseling Video Project. Data for this study came from 559 analogue clients who watched a videotape of a genetic counseling session. The analogue clients' variables of interest were: knowledge, informational satisfaction, interpersonal satisfaction, increase in state anxiety, decisional conflict, trait anxiety, literacy, numeracy, and nonverbal sensitivity. Latent class analysis and multinomial regression analysis were used to explicate the relationships among the variables. Open-ended responses were analyzed for word patterns that would further explain the quantitative findings.
Three analogue client patterns of response emerged: engaged/resolved, engaged/unresolved, and unengaged/unresolved. The most common response was to engage in the counseling process and be resolved in regard to genetic testing. A larger percentage of the prenatal analogue clients than the cancer clients were unengaged, but the clients were equally split in regard to decisional resolve. Poor learning and being unengaged in regard to decision making was significantly associated with lower trait anxiety, being African American, and choosing to talk to someone else before making a decision. Analogue clients who were engaged but unresolved had one significant predictor: talking to someone else before making a decision Analysis of the open-ended responses supported the descriptions of the response patterns.
Genetic counselors may need to utilize experiential teaching techniques or alter the way they communicate to increase client learning. Acknowledging that actions and demeanor can affect the interaction between the genetic counselor and client may help improve client resolve. The findings for the unengaged/unresolved analogue clients revealed that some clients may need extra time or explanation in order to understand genetic information better. Future research can explore whether recognition of the three response patterns helps genetic counselors differentiate their clients and whether this distinction is useful.
|School:||The Johns Hopkins University|
|School Location:||United States -- Maryland|
|Source:||DAI-B 72/03, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Genetics, Public health|
|Keywords:||Cancer genetic counseling, Client patterns, Genetic testing, Prenatal genetic counseling|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be