This study explored how social structure and cultural values dynamically interact in collective learning between two religious organizations cooperating in a joint project. It further explored the enablers of and impediments to collective learning in this context. The study employed the theoretical framework provided by the Organizational Learning Systems Model proposed by Schwandt and Marquardt (2000). This enthnomethodological case study collected data using participant observation, direct observation of events, video recordings from the site, interviews, and document review. The findings revealed that six learning patterns involving a clash of cultural priorities and of culture-structure interaction impeded collective learning. As a result of these findings, the researcher concluded that (a) the two cultural groups hold the same cultural values, but prioritize them in different ways; (b) each cultural group overemphasizes its prioritized values in a way that polarizes the two value systems; (c) the interaction of cultural values and structure within each group locks it into its own system, thereby impeding learning from the other group; and (d) one group tends to impose its culture-structure interaction on the other when the two groups are interacting.
|Advisor:||Schwandt, David R.|
|Commitee:||Croswell, Clyde V., Larsen, Samuel|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Human and Organizational Learning|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 72/01, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Social studies education, Organization Theory, Social structure|
|Keywords:||Collective, Cross-cultural, Cultural values, Ethnomethodology, Learning, Organization, Religious, Social structure|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be