This study was prompted by the growing amount of research that is in support of science reform and from this researcher’s personal experience and concern that science instructions is no longer a top priority in elementary schools nor are young scientists given the opportunities to act as scientists in a real world setting. This study uses experiential education strategies in a workshop format to try and affect change in the attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions of elementary science teachers.
Experiential education is not new, but the methods of teaching can span a wide range of topics. The main focus of the workshop featured in this study was a combination of outdoor education and inquiry. The format was Project WET, a program focused on the teaching and learning of water education.
The workshop was given to pre-service teachers enrolled in a science methods course at a local university. The workshop was held both in and out of doors and featured six lessons from the Project WET Activity Guide.
Data gathered offered insight into pre-service elementary teachers’ attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions of science instruction, through the use of the Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument. A z test for the difference in proportions for two sample means was used to analyze each statement on the STEBI, individually. A follow-up questionnaire, via an online survey instrument, provided feedback regarding the Project WET workshop.
Final analysis indicated no significant difference in the responses to 12 of the 13 individual questions, but follow-up survey questions indicate that there are definite advantages to further research.
|Commitee:||Emrick, William, Wisdom, Sherrie|
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||DAI-A 71/12, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Elementary education, Science education|
|Keywords:||Experiential education, Science, Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument, Water education|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be