Ownership of mass media companies in recent years has grown increasingly concentrated in many areas of the world. Consolidation of ownership has raised fears among some industry observers that declining media pluralism could affect the political functions performed by the mass media for democratic societies. This study uses longitudinal analysis to assess claims that declining media pluralism impairs democratic institutions, the observance of human rights, and the control of corruption.
I first explain the economic logic behind steady consolidation of media ownership, and the rationale for concerns about declining media pluralism. I then examine the European media market, which confronts both issues of media ownership consolidation and commercialization of former state broadcasting systems. In Chapter Five, I use a dataset with information from former communist countries to analyze the effects of media pluralism on observance of human rights and corruption. Using logistic and ordinary least square regression, I find mixed results. Lower levels of media pluralism are associated with poorer records with some human rights, but not with all of the human rights surveyed. Also, lower levels of media pluralism do not show statistically significant effects on levels of corruption.
I follow this quantitative analysis with a case study that examines one of the countries included in the dataset. I draw upon my first hand experience in Azerbaijan as a journalism instructor to examine how the media and the political environment in that country have changed since its independence 20 years ago. Media pluralism has become increasingly constricted in Azerbaijan, as levels of corruption and human rights abuses have increased.
Finally, I revisit the media environment within the United States, presenting data on the current state of media ownership. I discuss technological trends in media leading to growing partisanship of both the news media and the media audience. I conclude overall that effects of lower levels of media pluralism are deleterious and conditional on the existing institutions of a country. Where democratic institutions are stronger, the effects of lower media pluralism can be mitigated, but when democratic institutions are weak, the effects of lower media pluralism can be severe.
|Advisor:||Cingranelli, David L.|
|Commitee:||Fordham, Benjamin, Gay, Pamela, Sieberg, Katri K.|
|School:||State University of New York at Binghamton|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 71/11, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Communication, Political science, Mass communications|
|Keywords:||Externalities, Human rights, Media, Monopolies, Ownership, Pluralism|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be