This study examines the contestation between different modes of relevance creation in the current context of digital media. Relevance is understood as a selective direction of attention, and as a phenomenon generated through social processes. Relevance must be produced within a specific medium, and new media call into question established social processes, and offer opportunity for their renegotiation. Relevance is significant in that practices which direct attention determine the creation of publics, which are held by Michael Warner to be constituted though attention.
Using ethnographic observation methods, I gathered data about web sites exemplary of two different modes of relevance creation, LibraryThing and MetaFilter. LibraryThing generates relevance through aggregation, in which many individual classifications are statistically merged. MetaFilter envisions itself as a community, a social body characterized by shared resources. Community members can create relevance by their individual selection of texts in accordance with the community’s values. Each approach, despite appealing to the novelty of digital media, calls upon durable social categories in order to create value. LibraryThing’s approach relies on models of the free market, in which individual selfish action produces overall societal benefit. MetaFilter defines community through exclusion of anonymous participation, and potential members must pass through obstacles and maintain a stable identity to participate. This approach envisions community as founded upon limits imposed to keep destructive human tendencies in check.
|Advisor:||Dent, Alexander S.|
|Commitee:||Murphy, Teresa A.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||MAI 49/01M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Cultural anthropology, Multimedia Communications, Web Studies|
|Keywords:||Aggregation, Community, New media, Publics, Relevance|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be