In 1973, team owners in Major League Baseball’s American League voted in favor of introducing the designated hitter into their offensive lineups. The National League owners voted against such a rule change that year and since on several different occurrences. Baseball fans, sportswriters, players, owners, economists and others have weighed in on the impact of the designated hitter rule change on Major League Baseball. Chapter One of this paper reviews recent published writings by economists on the impact of the designated hitter. Team owners gave several reasons for advocating the dramatic designated rule change in the American League. Chapter Two considers each of these reasons and compares them against actual statistical data to determine accuracy of team owner foresight. In other words, after 36 seasons of the designated hitter, did American League owners’ landmark decision achieve its intended goals? Chapter Three takes the previous chapter arguments and tests several variables that resulted from the DH ruling against attendance. Chapter Four suggests several points of interest that appear to be unresolved in the existing economic DH literature. This paper considers the impact of the DH on offense, defense and attendance in Major League Baseball. In the end, attendance gains appear to strengthen the argument that American League owners were acting rationally when they instituted the DH rule change.
|Commitee:||Maloney, Michael, Sauer, Raymond|
|School Location:||United States -- South Carolina|
|Source:||MAI 49/01M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Sports Management, Economics, Economic theory|
|Keywords:||DH, Designated hitter, HBP|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be