This is a dissertation about United States international technology transfer policy relating to the Department of Defense (DOD) F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) weapons acquisition program. The research answers the question: Did the U.S. Government change its decision making technology transfer model for the JSF program based upon previous technology transfer experiences? The research is relevant, as the JSF program is the DOD’s largest ever financial investment for a new weapons acquisition program. The research suggests that the U.S. government did change its decision-making interagency approach to international technology transfer, and developed a new JSF technology transfer approach. Employing a case study analysis from previous multinational fighter aircraft development programs involving the F-16, the Lavi and the FS-X (F-2) fighter development programs, the research investigates the pattern of governmental decision-making processes in these three technology transfer case studies. Using a largely qualitative theoretical approach employing Allison’s Rational Actor, Organizational Process and Governmental Politics Models, the research determines what factors were successful in a given case leading to successful technology transfer, and those factors which did not in others. The research answers key questions on U.S. export control/technology transfer policy and the national security decision policy process. It also demonstrates that the Joint Strike Fighter program reflects a change in U.S. government international technology transfer processes.
|School:||George Mason University|
|School Location:||United States -- Virginia|
|Source:||DAI-A 71/09, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Public policy, Organization Theory, Military studies|
|Keywords:||F-16 Falcon, Joint Strike Fighter, Lavi Fighter, National security, Technology transfer, United States|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be