In the early spring of 1789 and within weeks of the start of the new government, the Senate and House became embroiled in a fight over how to address the president, a serious constitutional issue for republicans that formed the leading edge in increasingly partisan struggles over interpretations of executive power. Suggestions for a presidential title ranged from the unadorned “President” to “His Majesty the President” and various forms of “Highness.” Congress, the press, and individuals throughout the country debated more than a dozen titles, most with royal overtones. In a world full of monarchs and with the United States struggling for respect on the world stage, the republican resolution in favor of the modest title of “President of the United States” remained far from certain.
The presidential title controversy demonstrated that attitudes toward the Presidency remained precariously unresolved in 1789. Both the legislative and public debates on titles served as indispensable extensions of an unfinished ratification discourse regarding the Presidency that involved conflicting interpretations of dangerous strength (leading to monarchy) or disastrous weakness (leading to corruption of the president by aristocratic cabals of Senate or other elites). Cultural attitudes toward first president, George Washington, and societal attitudes toward titles, in general, added to the dispute.
So much more than an obsession with etiquette, the people of the early republic saw the presidential title controversy as a referendum on how to balance power and authority with individual freedoms in American society and politics. The controversy’s anti-monarchical outcome constituted an essential reckoning that affirmed the republican character of the American Revolution.
|Advisor:||Stott, Richard Briggs|
|Commitee:||Anbinder, Tyler, Bowling, Kenneth R., Fenn, Elizabeth A., Long, Charles T.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 71/08, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Adams, John, First Federal Congress, Presidency, Sovereignty, Title controversy, Washington, George|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be