Each year students are referred for special education evaluations based on teacher concerns of the student’s academic progress or the student’s success. Once the evaluation is completed and the Child Study Team meeting are held some students qualify for special education services under one of the thirteen disability categories. Other students will not be eligible for services based on one or more of the four categories used for not qualifying for services.
This study investigated what interventions were provided to the students who did not qualify, termed non-qualifying students, in this dissertation. A checklist of interventions for the individuals to use in preparing data was furnished by the researcher. Other information requested was the grade level of the student referral, reason for not qualifying, the student’s scores on the state MontCAS reading assessment, and how many years the school has been using the Response to Intervention process.
Five hundred and fifty Montana school superintendents, principals and special education directors were invited to participate through mailed invitations with the data collection tool enclosed. After the initial mailing, follow-up telephone calls were conducted and numerous emails sent. The total number of responses was 349 (64%) superintendents, principals and special education directors and responses fit into various categories such as not interested, too time consuming, no students fit the criteria, all students qualified, all new staff, data access problems, and no referrals. However, twelve (2%) districts or schools submitted the student data requested. While the data provided comes from schools ranging in size from 123 students to 2,995 students, generalizability is not supported due to the small sample size.
There were relationships between the reading score the year prior to the referral and the referral year, between the referral year and the year after, between the year prior to the referral and the year after the referral, and between the reason for the referral and the academic interventions used. No significant relationship exists between referral and grade level, academic interventions and MontCAS scores, interventions and RTI process, MontCAS scores and RTI process, or the size of school and participating in the study.
|Commitee:||Elser, Tammy, Evans, Roberta, Garfinkle, Ann, O'Reilly, Frances|
|School:||University of Montana|
|School Location:||United States -- Montana|
|Source:||DAI-A 71/07, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational leadership, Elementary education, Special education|
|Keywords:||Educational assistance, Interventions, Non-qualifying student, RTI, Response to Intervention, Special education|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be