Most of the scholarship on American exceptionalism focuses on two main categories: “comparative” and “unique” exceptionalism. After considering the limitations of each, the path forward is set. It will be shown that imperial American exceptionalism was a development in, rather than a constant feature of, the American political tradition.
Chapter One outlines the main problems with the way American exceptionalism is usually addressed by examining the claims of some leading social scientists. The widespread confusion is partly due to the comparative posture taken in addressing the question, which cannot comprehend the political phenomenon for what it is. This calls for an alternate method, which is developed in the latter half of the chapter with an emphasis on America’s heritage of political and religious thought and the contributions of Willmoore Kendall and George Carey, Robert Bellah, and Eric Voegelin.
Chapter Two takes up John Winthrop, said to be the father of American exceptionalism because of his famous simile that the Massachusetts Bay Colony will be as a “city on a hill.” Winthrop is, however no imperial exceptionalist, though aspects of his ideas prepare the way for others’ imperialism.
Chapter Three focuses on the change that occurs in American self-conception during the American founding. An examination of the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, the U.S. Constitution, and the Federalist shows a distinction into two spheres of what the Puritans formerly held as one.
Chapter Four covers Lincoln; rather than hewing to the traditional conception of the union as the development and reassertion of a long history of self-government, Lincoln recasts the American founding as the advent of a new kind of politics based on abstract ideas.
Chapter Five takes stock of the imperialism around the turn of the twentieth century, examining speeches by Albert Beveridge, Theodore Roosevelt, and Woodrow Wilson. Their imperialism is shown to be a re-combination of some of the central symbols of the tradition, but in a way that justifies actions previously held as illegitimate.
Chapter Six briefly evaluates the limitations of this dissertation and looks ahead to future related work.
|Advisor:||Carey, George W.|
|Commitee:||Mitchell, Joshua, Schall, S.J., Rev. James V.|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 71/07, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||American studies, American history, Political science|
|Keywords:||Beveridge, Albert, Empire, Exceptionalism, Exemplary, Imperial, Lincoln, Abraham, Roosevelt, Theodore, Wilson, Woodrow, Winthrop, John|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be