This dissertation proposes that since the 1920s, the dominant literary community of the American South has constructed a discrete Southern identity specifically in response to the threat of Cartesian skepticism. I investigate the relation of skepticism to what William Faulkner insists is the peculiarly Southern “need to talk, to tell” from the perspective of the ordinary language philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein, Stanley Cavell, and J. L. Austin. Specifically, I examine a group of Southern writers (the Nashville Agrarians, William Faulkner, Flannery O’Connor, and Cormac McCarthy) for whom the problem of the South, problems of telling, and problems of knowledge are inseparable. I propose that in waging epistemological battles within specifically Southern contexts and conflicts, these writers are doing a kind of “Southern” philosophy that demands attention as philosophy—and as Southern.
I emphasize how these writers do or do not “mean what they say” with regard to Southern identity, history, and language by examining their work within Wittgenstein’s notion of the language-game, the specific context in which the meaning of a word is understood as its use and intelligibility within that context. Wittgenstein’s insistence that language is internal to, not external to, experience foregrounds an ethical intersubjectivity; he posits a community of language-users who, in the act of speaking, acknowledge one another’s humanity through and in language rather than knowledge. I contend that these Southern writers fixate on problems of knowledge for several reasons: to recover their lost world, to avoid the acknowledgment of others (especially African American others) or to repudiate their own self-knowledge.
I conclude that these writers are engaged in an ontological and epistemological quest to establish either a transcendent order of knowledge (the Agrarians and Flannery O’Connor) or to definitively deny knowledge altogether (Faulkner) and that this drama enacts, in the arena of epistemology, the same dynamic of failure and defeat that defines the Southern Lost Cause. In Cormac McCarthy, the drama is resolved through Cavell’s notion of acknowledgment. By casting these questions in terms of skepticism, I confront the anxiety in these Southern writers over problems of knowledge and link them to the ethical stakes of human intersubjectivity.
|Commitee:||Hubbard, Stacy C., Swan, Jim|
|School:||State University of New York at Buffalo|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 71/06, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Faulkner, William, O'Connor, Flannery, Ordinary language philosophy, Skepticism, South, Southern literature, Tate, Allen|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be