Research on well-being suggests that in dual-earner couples, men benefit more from marriage than women, due to the differing nature of men and women's work and family roles (Hughes and Galinsky, 1994). Research on moral reasoning (Gilligan, 1982) and “loss of voice” in girls and women (Brown & Gilligan, 1992) suggest than women make decisions based on a care perspective and often sacrifice themselves in order to maintain relationship. This study describes married women's voices and how they make moral decisions regarding their work and family roles, and the subsequent impact on well-being.
Six women from evangelical and mainline Presbyterian churches were interviewed and described narratives of moral and relational choice around work and family roles. The interviews were analyzed at four levels—story, self/voice, care, and justice according to the Reading Guide/Guide to Listening (Brown, Tappan, Gilligan, Miller and Argyris, 1989; Brown, Debold, Tappan and Gilligan, 1991; Brown and Gilligan 1991, 1992). The women's “voices” were compared with measures of well-being, marital adjustment, family values progressivism and traditionalism. A composite voice was formed which highlights significant themes. The most significant theme was the woman's work was considered “extra” by her and her husband. Most of the women aligned themselves with the care perspective and this influenced their work and family choices. Church/faith experience may have accounted for more voice among these women than anticipated. Myths of the modern Christian family need to be challenged.
|Advisor:||Furrow, James L.|
|School:||Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Psychology|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-B 71/03, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Religion, Social psychology, Womens studies, Individual & family studies|
|Keywords:||Christian, Dual-earner couples, Evangelical, Family, Married women's voices, Moral choices, Well-being, Women|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be