The aim of this study was to analyze the reliability and validity of the Activities, Independent Research, Internship/Practica/Clinical, Laboratory, Online, Seminar, Standard Lecture, and Studio-Performance course forms of the Students’ Assessment of Instruction (SAI) instrument. The participants were volunteers from the student population at Western Carolina University (WCU) for the spring 2007, fall 2007, and spring 2008 semesters. The reliability and validity were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), generalizability theory (g-theory), and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). Findings were mixed. The Independent Research Course Form had no evidence of reliability and validity while the Online Course Form had some evidence of validity but no evidence of reliability. All other course forms had moderate to excellent validity. Suggested changes for the course forms are discussed.
|Advisor:||McCord, David M.|
|Commitee:||Habel, John, Henderson, Bruce B.|
|School:||Western Carolina University|
|School Location:||United States -- North Carolina|
|Source:||MAI 47/05M, Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||School administration, Psychology, Experimental psychology, Quantitative psychology, Higher education|
|Keywords:||Confirmatory factor analysis, Generalizability theory, Hierarchical linear modeling, Perceived learning, Student evaluations, Teacher effectiveness|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.