Teacher quality matters when it comes to student achievement. However, the fact that there are no nationally mandated standards as to how teachers should be prepared has led to wide variations in the quality of teacher education programs. It was in response to this situation that the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) was established. The purpose of this qualitative participant observational study was to present how teacher educators perceive the effect of complying with NCATE standards on teacher preparation programs and on their own teaching practices. Eight purposefully selected faculty members of a university-based teacher preparation program participated in the study. The findings are presented in a narrative form using direct quotations of responses the participants gave to questions asked during confidential interviews. Results of the interviews were analyzed and emergent themes were identified. The findings were corroborated through analysis of related documents. Positive effects of having to meet NCATE standards included a belief that the unit's image and reputation were enhanced. Other perceived benefits included improvements in the unit's assessment system and better communications among the faculty. However, several teacher educators felt that the amount of money, time and energy expended on the NCATE process outweighed the benefits. Seven of the eight participants referred to the process as something which had to be done "for NCATE" rather than perceiving the process as a transformative change initiative designed to enhance teacher preparation and thereby improve student learning. One conclusion that can be drawn from this study is that if NCATE fails to be seen as aligning with the personal ethics and belief structure of teacher educators and with those of K-12 teachers, NCATE's effect on teacher education programs will continue to be seen as "procedural" and not as having a meaningful effect or of creating lasting change. Another conclusion is that teacher educators generally were unlikely to change their own teaching styles or practices in any meaningful way in response to NCATE standards, even in the face of a state mandate to implement those standards.
|Advisor:||Bassett, Caroline L.|
|Commitee:||Merrill, Herbert, Walling, Griffin|
|Department:||School of Education|
|School Location:||United States -- Minnesota|
|Source:||DAI-A 71/02, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||School administration, Teacher education, Higher education|
|Keywords:||Mandated standards, NCATE, National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education, Perceptions, Teacher education, Teacher educators, Teacher preparation|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be