The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability of forensic sexual assault examiners when observing genital photographs of sexual assault victims. One hundred consecutive victim cases were evaluated; 8 examiners each observed 50 victim cases.
The major findings showed good reliability among examiners when observing whether or not an acute genital injury was present but poor reliability when examiners were asked to name the specific type of acute genital injury.
Recommendations for future research included using this study's model as a baseline for future studies, enlarging the sample size to include more experienced examiners from other regions, using more images within each case, predetermining the descriptive terms prior to the study's commencement and including the term "nonspecific" as a response choice.
|Advisor:||Kumrow, David E.|
|School:||California State University, Long Beach|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||MAI 47/05M, Masters Abstracts International|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be