Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

Indirect pulp treatment versus formocresol pulpotomy in human primary molars: A randomized controlled trial
by Roberts, John David, M.S., The Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 2009, 49; 1462151
Abstract (Summary)

Purpose. This prospective study compared indirect pulp treatment (IPT) with formocresol pulpotomy (FP) in large carious lesions in primary molars. Methods. Selection criteria: pairs of asymptomatic, contralateral primary molars treatment planned for FP. Teeth were randomized to receive either FP or IPT. Eighteen patients (26 pairs of teeth) were followed clinically and radiographically for ≥1 year. Two blinded examiners evaluated and scored radiographs. Results. No clinical pathology was observed at ≥1 year. Radiographic findings indicated: no change in 21 IPT and 13 FP teeth; calcific metamorphosis in 3 IPT and 4 FP teeth; pathologic changes requiring observation in 1 IPT and 6 FP teeth; extraction required in 1 IPT and 3 FP teeth. Median radiographic score was higher for FP (1.5) than IPT (1), indicating significantly more radiographic changes in FP (p=0.003). Conclusions. IPT is an acceptable alternative to FP in primary molars with large carious lesions at ≥1 year.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor: Seale, Nancy S.
Commitee: Kerins, Carolyn A., McWhorter, Alton G., Wright, John M.
School: The Texas A&M University System Health Science Center
Department: Pediatric Dentistry
School Location: United States -- Texas
Source: MAI 47/04M, Masters Abstracts International
Source Type: DISSERTATION
Subjects: Dentistry
Keywords: Formocresol, Indirect pulp treatment, Primary teeth, Pulpotomy, Vital pulp therapy
Publication Number: 1462151
ISBN: 9781109054668
Copyright © 2019 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy
ProQuest