When administrators make decisions about the infrastructure support needs of a current or planned online teaching program, these decisions are often based on external expert advice rather than on the advice of experienced ground level faculty who are living with the dynamic nature of the technology and support needed to develop and maintain an effective online teaching program. Online teaching faculty are the best source of advice and information on what works and what does not.
Faculty at the Medical College of Georgia (MCG) were surveyed to find out what elements are important to the development of an effective online teaching program. Faculty were also asked to validate the Online Teaching Infrastructure Matrix designed to help campus administration evaluate the current administrative support they provide to online teaching programs. Many of the MCG faculty have 20 or more years teaching experience, but less than that teaching online. Data were collected through the use of a survey titled “Online Faculty Support Survey,” which was developed by the researcher. The survey served to identify: (a) faculty perceptions of what elements are important to the development of a successful online teaching program; (b) which of those elements were in use at their specific institution; (c) factors serving to enhance faculty participation in an online teaching program, and which factors impede their involvement; and (d) faculty perceptions of the clarity and expected effectiveness of the Matrix.
The survey has been evaluated by a panel of experts consisting of a statistician, an instructional designer, a program support specialist, a multimedia support specialist, an academic services professional, an information technology network support professional, and two faculty online program directors. Careful analysis of the data received from the responses to the survey reveals specific areas that faculty deem important to an online teaching program, and whether their specific institution actively provides those important elements. The data were coded and further analyzed to identify areas where there may be significant differences between what faculty deem to be important elements of infrastructure support and what is actively provided by their institution.
The validated Matrix is a useful tool that administrative decision makers at MCG can rely on to help them maintain SACS accreditation standards, and other institutions can use it to develop an online teaching program or enhance an existing program. It can be modified to meet specific needs of the institution, or updated to reflect changing technology.
|Advisor:||Abramson, Gertrude (Trudy)|
|Commitee:||Barefield, Amanda C., Snyder, Martha M.|
|School:||Nova Southeastern University|
|Department:||Computing Technology in Education (MCTE, DCTE)|
|School Location:||United States -- Florida|
|Source:||DAI-A 70/01, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||School administration, Teacher education, Educational technology|
|Keywords:||Administration, Administrative support, Education, Faculty, Infrastructure, Online, Online teaching, Support, Training|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be