This qualitative study explored the roles which exist between pre-service elementary teachers and the technology tools they integrate into their mathematics lesson plans. A total of 35 pre-service elementary teachers participated in this study in which the researcher examined their lesson plans and reflection documents.
The project occurred during a one-semester elementary mathematics methods course during which the participants were assigned to plan and teach three lessons, one of which required the use of technology. While writing their lesson plans, participants completed a three-page reflection document to explain their uses of technology. In addition, participants were asked to complete a survey, and selected participants were invited to participate in interviews.
The results of this study suggest seven roles between pre-service elementary teachers and the technology tools they integrate into their lesson plans: Technology Not Used (TNU), TNU - Willing, TNU - Master, Master, Master - Servant, Servant, and Servant - Partner. Two of these roles, Master and Servant, have already been documented in the literature. The other five roles were identified in the present study. After qualitative analysis, the researcher concluded that access to technology, cooperating teachers, and prior experiences with technology had no significant influence on these roles. The results of the study suggest that curriculum goals do have an influence on these roles. Specifically, pre-service teachers who tended to choose the objective first and used technology to support the lesson objectives were found at the higher end of the hierarchy (Master-Servant, Servant, and Servant-Partner). Conversely, pre-service teachers who tended to give no explicit statement regarding the role of the objective to the lesson plan when selecting technology tools were found at the lower end of the hierarchy (in particular, Master). Participants primarily evaluated their technology tools on the basis of Surface Features (which includes Software Features and Motivation) rather than Content and Instruction (which includes Learning and Mathematics). Finally, participants primarily identified affordances and limitations of technology tools which focused on Surface Features rather than Content and Instruction. The reflection document completed by the participants has potential for future use by pre-service elementary teachers in their mathematics methods courses.
|Advisor:||Suh, Jennifer M.|
|School:||George Mason University|
|School Location:||United States -- Virginia|
|Source:||DAI-A 70/07, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Mathematics education, Teacher education, Educational technology|
|Keywords:||Lesson planning, Mathematics, Mathematics education, Preservice teachers, Technology, Technology tools|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be