The quantitative cross-sectional survey study involved an examination of participating Oklahoma community college presidents’ perceptions of their transformational leadership styles. A comparison ensued between the participants’ perceptions and the perceptions of the presidents’ transformational leadership styles observed by faculty and staff using the Kouzes and Posner (2007) Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI). The purpose of the study was to determine if a difference existed between the presidents’ perceptions of their leadership practices and the perceptions of the presidents’ leadership practices by faculty and staff. Descriptive statistics of the participating faculty and staff members showed similar perceptions of the presidents’ abilities in the leadership practices in all five leadership styles and were at the high end of the LPI rating scale. When compared with the Kouzes and Posner (2003b) database of the people who have taken this version of the LPI, the presidents’ self-scores were in the moderate to high percentile, and the faculty and staff observed scores were in the moderate percentile. The inferential statistics of the five paired t tests for both the faculty and the staff showed no statistically significant difference with the presidents; therefore, the null hypotheses were not rejected. The study results showed that the presidents have an understanding of all of the transformational leadership practices set forth by Kouzes and Posner (2007). The strongest finding was that the faculty and staff’s perceptions were not statistically different from the presidents’ perceptions.
|School:||University of Phoenix|
|School Location:||United States -- Arizona|
|Source:||DAI-A 70/05, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Community college education, Management, School administration|
|Keywords:||Community college leadership, Community colleges, Higher education leadership, Kouzes and Posner, Leadership, Leadership Practices Inventory, Oklahoma Community College, Transformational leadership|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be