Education can be a lonely business. Teachers and administrators are often separated from other adult professionals in isolated classrooms, offices, and administration buildings. Geographic remoteness only exacerbates personal seclusion, preventing collaboration concerning how to foster student learning and wellbeing. Bringing a disparate group of potentially isolated educational leaders together, in 2005 the Educational Administration Department (EAD) at Central University in the United States created a local/distance (mixed) PhD cohort. Pathways, a special unit embedded within EAD, spearheaded the plan; infused the curriculum with collaborative community literature; intended to enhance student administrative expertise; and, if desired, prepared students for the college professorate. I was a cohort member, and my co-author taught four research courses scattered throughout the program. Classes are over now, and 13 out of 14 original members are defending prospecti and dissertations.
For the most part Pathways realized its expectations, and the group became a professional learning community (PLC). This study produced three thematic lenses through which to see the cohort's evolution: job-related challenges, technology struggles, and interpersonal relationships. This methodology centers on a phenomenological dramaturgy. Cooley (1922) and Mead (1934/1967) guided our view of the phenomenon as the cohort's historical group development toward each individual's evolving professional- and self-perceptions within a community context. We present the findings in a four-act play (Goffman, 1959). Our special attention to students speaks to future virtual and local doctoral cohort developers and those who theorize about successful doctoral education. Being a good educator means paying attention to details—in this case, the ever-changing social self-constructions that can make or break a student's experience.
|Advisor:||O'Hair, Mary J., Vaughn, Courtney A.|
|Commitee:||Eseryel, Deniz, Garn, Gregg, Wilson, Scott|
|School:||The University of Oklahoma|
|Department:||Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies|
|School Location:||United States -- Oklahoma|
|Source:||DAI-A 70/07, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||School administration, Curriculum development, Higher education|
|Keywords:||Dramaturgy, Graduate education, Pathways, Phenomenology, Professional learning community, Virtual|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be